HP ENVY Desktop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY Desktop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 08 '24 at 14:18
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 166
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 316
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.3
6% 6.07 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 76.3
Mixed 91.2
45% 209 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 19.3
97% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 93.9
103% 183 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 87%
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 1TB
127GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 79.4
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
4% 1.53 MB/s
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
75GB free, PID 1000, samsung bar 256gb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.5
Write 30.6
Mixed 29.2
40% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 1.3
353% 4.73 MB/s
DQ Read 6.5
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 1.4
463% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 6% 34 90 57 60 0.7" 1280 720 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical ENVY Desktop Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY Desktop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback