Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 11:18
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 585
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,115
Write 1,230
Mixed 1,022
251% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 46.8
152% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 561
411% 543 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LXM3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 166
Write 162
Mixed 75.2
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
17GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 145
Write 34.9
Mixed 51.9
78% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.7
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 10 60 34" 3440 1369 LEN61F3 LEN T34w-20
Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback