Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '24 at 12:14
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 53 1-Core 12.9 2-Core 31.6 24% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 45.2 8-Core 40.4 6% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 31.6 2% 31.6 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 14.1 8% 11.5 fps	MRender 8.2 Gravity 11 Splatting 9.8 8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 113 82 92 46 44 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 208 Write 334 Mixed 222 SusWrite 86.7 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 7.9 33% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 134 93% 118 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 209%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 100GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 46 42 40 42 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 44.7 Write 45.4 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 46.2 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 2.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 9.2 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 882 4% 882 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	120	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0036

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	624x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	73x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	378x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	278x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	41x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	376x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	124x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	63x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	206x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	130x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	79x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16