Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 22:06
Run Duration426 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14400-$200
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 58.9
1-Core 170
2-Core 339
96% 189 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1,026
102% 833 Pts
64-Core 1,584
98% 1,584 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$460
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 192
Parallax 180
160% 190 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 143
Splatting 128
122% 152 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Evo M.2 1TB-$85
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,194
Write 2,389
Mixed 1,847
479% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 64.2
220% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 1,180
DQ Mixed 998
767% 1,030 MB/s
Poor: 205% Great: 397%
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
238GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,900
Write 2,058
Mixed 1,610
415% 1856 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 58.2
200% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,310
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 1,118
837% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 296%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
129GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,397
Write 1,563
Mixed 1,213
311% 1,391 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 57.8
203% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 982
764% 1055 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
87GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,376
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,800
475% 2131 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 69.9
239% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 990
DQ Mixed 1,125
848% 1,141 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
104GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 428
Mixed 385
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 42.4
147% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 252
213% 311 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 114%
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
117GB free
Firmware: 211070WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1361
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,370
324% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 60.9
218% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,114
839% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 274%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5,176
Write 0.2
1,849% 2,588 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1,633% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 167
Mixed 80.2
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
608GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10
Write 12.2
Mixed 11.7
15% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5600C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 31.5" 1280 720 ACR073A XZ322QU
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $1,448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback