Biostar H510MH/E 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH/E 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 20:38
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 308
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 966
96% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$499
Nvidia(10DE 1800) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 263
Parallax 280
234% 277 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 240
Splatting 188
205% 261 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 200%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8I40100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,779
Write 1,097
Mixed 1,053
289% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 14.2
129% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 369
352% 557 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
880GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 181 182 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 184
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 180
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 25.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.8" 1920 1080 SAM7178 LS24AG30x
Typical H510MH/E 2.0 Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH/E 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback