bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DZ77GA-70K
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130521
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:50
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 175
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 472
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 137
Parallax 133
98% 130 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 132
Splatting 112
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 61 55 53 60 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 471
Write 449
Mixed 389
SusWrite 59
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 21.1
100% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 72.9
DQ Mixed 93.8
79% 118 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 121%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
100GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 98 95 77 62 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 468
Write 427
Mixed 405
SusWrite 118
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
165GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 74.9
Write 64.1
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 70.1
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX 04CD F3-2400C11-4GAB KHX2400C11D3/4GX 04CD F3-2400C11-4GAB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 70% 30 96 59 144 24.5" 1920 1017 ACR0724 VG252Q
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback