Gigabyte GA-A620M C-Y1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 254%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics271% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive452% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M C-Y1  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 04:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$193
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 85.5
1-Core 189
2-Core 338
110% 204 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,016
96% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Asus(1043 0506) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
271% Outstanding
Lighting 352
Reflection 494
Parallax 816
287% 554 fps
MRender 549
Gravity 297
Splatting 481
364% 442 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 271%
Great: 294%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850 PS5 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 615000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1954 3315 3356 3610 2641 1673 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 3,635
Write 3,499
Mixed 2,852
SusWrite 2,758
716% 3,186 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 60.9
206% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,059
DQ Write 1,307
DQ Mixed 1,684
1,255% 1,683 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 452%
Great: 653%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 79.3
MC Mixed 71.5
200% 70 GB/s
SC Read 56.8
SC Write 71.2
SC Mixed 61.1
180% 63 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 192%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2WG3-
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback