Gigabyte GA-A620M C-Y1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 259%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 259%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics280% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive435% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M C-Y1  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$193
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 187
2-Core 339
111% 205 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 1,058
94% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,341
83% 1,341 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Asus(1043 0506) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
280% Outstanding
Lighting 372
Reflection 485
Parallax 824
303% 560 fps
MRender 552
Gravity 300
Splatting 479
364% 444 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 280%
Great: 294%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850 PS5 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 615000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2511 3597 3484 3352 1024 1208 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
435% Outstanding
Read 3464
Write 3,576
Mixed 2,862
SusWrite 2,529
700% 3,108 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 61.4
218% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,040
DQ Write 1,360
DQ Mixed 1708
1,272% 1,702 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 435%
Great: 653%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$90
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
191% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 79
MC Mixed 71.3
199% 69.8 GB/s
SC Read 56.5
SC Write 67.7
SC Mixed 62.5
178% 62.2 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 191%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2WG3-
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback