TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B760 Pro RS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 415%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 499%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics364% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive719% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B760 Pro RS  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760 Pro RS
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231226
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 00:09
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 215
2-Core 438
124% 243 Pts
4-Core 871
8-Core 1,640
150% 1,255 Pts
64-Core 2,986
185% 2,986 Pts
Poor: 120% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Asus(1043 88E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
364% Outstanding
Lighting 577
Reflection 546
Parallax 742
470% 622 fps
MRender 500
Gravity 543
Splatting 290
348% 444 fps
Poor: 303% ↑
This bench: 364%
 Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 22 5.7 0.4 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
719% Outstanding
Read 7134
Write 79.3
Mixed 155
SusWrite 14.7
384% 1,846 MB/s
4K Read 1,070
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 9.7
1,637% 362 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑
This bench: 719%
 Great: 526%
Vaseky V800/500G 500GB
27GB free
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 11 18 68 39 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
127GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 21 5.4 0.4 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Fanxiang S500PRO 2TB
797GB free
Firmware: SN11795
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 22 1.4 41 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
821% Outstanding
Read 8,678
Write 69
Mixed 132
SusWrite 27.2
462% 2,227 MB/s
4K Read 1,172
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 8.6
1,789% 395 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑
This bench: 821%
 Great: 368%
Asmt 2115 500GB
168GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 0.8 0 1.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 KF560C40-8 KF560C40-8 32GB
4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
164% Outstanding
MC Read 70.1
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 63.4
182% 63.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 32.8
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 137% ↑
This bench: 164%
 Great: 164%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 PHLC27B 27M1N3500LS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B760 Pro RS Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 306%
UFO

System: Asrock B760 Pro RS

CPU
Core i5-13600KFIntel  $235Bench 122%, 24,875 samples107x
Core i5-12400FIntel  $122Bench 98%, 48,886 samples49x
Core i5-13600KIntel  $260Bench 122%, 27,559 samples39x
GPU
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $773Bench 240%, 46,082 samples50x
RTX 4070Nvidia  $550Bench 190%, 45,585 samples47x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples37x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples29x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples27x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples17x
RAM
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples33x
KF552C40-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 155%, 10,661 samples20x
KF556C40-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 165%, 7,511 samples18x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback