Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 04:22
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 685
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Asus(1043 8797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 114
Parallax 90.8
81% 101 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 88
Splatting 82.4
78% 96.9 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 643 667 556 515 444 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 566
Mixed 535
SusWrite 575
122% 540 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 52.9
178% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 754
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 1,072
715% 854 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 143%
Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
756GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 88 85 88 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 93
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 85.6
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
791GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 187 190 185 189 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 141
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 184
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 122 117 121 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 126
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 120
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB/16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 8 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback