HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 10:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,006
93% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
HP(103C 8550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3682 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 228
Parallax 274
192% 246 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 228
Splatting 186
184% 232 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 172%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,333
Write 893
Mixed 846
226% 1,024 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 60.9
209% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 725
DQ Mixed 216
254% 425 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 203%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
597GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 138 135 137 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 134
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 135
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
372GB free, PID 1004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 36.6
Write 38.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 39.3
51% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 32 60 72.1" 1280 720 AUS2707 NV Surround
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $865
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback