HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 09:37
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 968
92% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,332
Write 904
Mixed 839
227% 1,025 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.6
207% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 219
258% 431 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 203%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
613GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 138 138 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 133
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 138
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
375GB free, PID 1004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 39.5
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 40.3
52% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 26.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 24.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 31 60 0" 1280 720
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $871
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback