Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 22:18
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 842
87% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 200
Parallax 227
111% 188 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 149
Splatting 93.3
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,571
Write 2,253
Mixed 1,548
472% 2,124 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 87.9
300% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1002
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,146
826% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
307GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 490 491 491 491 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 484
Mixed 450
SusWrite 490
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.2
216% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
37GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 490 490 491 484 465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 493
Mixed 445
SusWrite 485
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 66.3
221% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
276GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1253 1264 1265 1265 1265 1266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,481
Write 1,263
Mixed 1,117
SusWrite 1263
288% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 79.1
269% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,405
DQ Write 1153
DQ Mixed 1,235
936% 1,264 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 277%
Great: 393%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
635GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 84 85 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 65.1
Write 52.9
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 84.3
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41.3
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 38.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA131 DELL U3419W
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback