Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 17:55
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 843
87% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 204
Parallax 229
112% 190 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 151
Splatting 94
96% 120 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,599
Write 2,255
Mixed 1,591
477% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 88.6
302% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 1044
DQ Mixed 1,143
826% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
307GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 491 490 491 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 493
Mixed 455
SusWrite 490
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 66.5
219% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
37GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 489 490 489 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 492
Mixed 444
SusWrite 488
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 66.8
223% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
276GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1258 1273 1267 1272 1266 1273 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,278
Mixed 1,148
SusWrite 1,268
292% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 80.2
275% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,391
DQ Write 1,148
DQ Mixed 1,233
933% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 279%
Great: 393%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
635GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 77 78 75 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 58
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 76.1
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 41
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 38.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA131 DELL U3419W
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback