HP Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8954
Memory13 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231205
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 23:32
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 165
2-Core 314
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 942
92% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 23.8
25% 28.1 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 21.5
19% 24 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 660 226 219 209 162 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1450
Write 1,352
Mixed 1,297
SusWrite 284
245% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 48.2
160% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1012
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,053
798% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 173%
Great: 217%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
23GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 410
Mixed 375
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 13.6
79% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 23.5
72% 149 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 18.5
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA115 DELL P2219H
Typical Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro SFF 400 G9 Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback