Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 15:54
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 179
2-Core 344
111% 206 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 997
103% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
117% 144 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 144
Splatting 144
118% 144 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 114%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C700 M.2 NVMe SSD 240GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0801L2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 304 299 322 349 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,221
Write 422
Mixed 553
SusWrite 329
139% 632 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 61.1
200% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 206
227% 385 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 177%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
306GB free
Firmware: 02K0S86D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 421 423 424 424 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 411
Mixed 408
SusWrite 419
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 50.3
162% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 135
124% 192 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 127%
PP5-8D512-L1 512GB
226GB free
Firmware: LTNFW1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 574 585 579 579 582 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,925
Write 2,000
Mixed 880
SusWrite 679
306% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.3
185% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 1,305
DQ Mixed 1,300
989% 1,333 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 236%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE1 BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 40.7
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 34.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 36.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 49 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7768 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback