HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '24 at 14:06
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 56 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 130 51% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 223 27% 209 Pts	64-Core 245 15% 245 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3397) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 83 77 80 78 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 80.7 Write 138 Mixed 124 SusWrite 80.6 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 15 56% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 109 93% 133 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 10 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	19	11	60	23.8"	1280 1057	SAM71A7 S24R35xFZ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 MT Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	230x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	119x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	80x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	101x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	13x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 28%, 425 samples	18x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	13x
RMR5030EB68F9W1600 0443 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GBUnknownBench 49%, 36 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16