Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '24 at 23:23
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 173 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 471 49% 392 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 26,559 User benchmarks, average bench 132% Asus(1043 88AC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	134% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 173 Parallax 166 151% 175 fps	MRender 227 Gravity 135 Splatting 116 125% 159 fps
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 178 173 171 168 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 466 Write 296 Mixed 278 SusWrite 186 68% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 26.5 98% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 241 198% 286 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 212GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 428 430 431 431 432 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 430 Mixed 403 SusWrite 425 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 40.8 132% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 338 251% 334 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 4x4GB 377 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.6 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	144	40.1"	1280 720	MSI3EA5 MSI MAG401QR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	68x
Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	61x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $99Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16