Intel X99-D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-D4  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 04:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 181
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 767
67% 568 Pts
64-Core 1,779
110% 1,779 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
PwrHis(1787 2398) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.4% Good
Lighting 87.1
Reflection 94.1
Parallax 132
71% 104 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 96
Splatting 62.3
63% 79.4 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon S980 128 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 142 141 145 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90% Excellent
Read 792
Write 381
Mixed 258
SusWrite 142
86% 393 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 42.6
103% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 202
192% 306 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 21.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 34" 1280 720 AUS3435 ASUS VG34V
Typical X99-D4 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback