Lenovo 80Q7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80Q7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Paris 5A8
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 12:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 117
49% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 140
23% 164 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 6.5
2% 4.33 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 196 5.6 171 12 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 243
Write 331
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 115
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.8
35% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 0.2
31% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 17 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO45EC
Typical 80Q7 Builds (Compare 734 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80Q7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback