MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results


Gaming 195% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 219% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	95.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230629
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '24 at 00:26
Run Duration	447 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 73.3 1-Core 172 2-Core 339 102% 195 Pts	4-Core 672 8-Core 1,162 111% 917 Pts	64-Core 2,210 137% 2,210 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$600 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 3897) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	202% Outstanding	Lighting 300 Reflection 256 Parallax 297 245% 285 fps	MRender 323 Gravity 237 Splatting 173 192% 244 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 235GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 325 360 359 364 364 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 448 Mixed 441 SusWrite 356 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 55.7 182% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 214 161% 215 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,338 Write 1,284 Mixed 1,231 356% 1,618 MB/s	4K Read 57.6 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 73.1 245% 83.8 MB/s	DQ Read 980 DQ Write 796 DQ Mixed 963 700% 913 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 107GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 176 186 195 194 192 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 373 Write 368 Mixed 349 SusWrite 188 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 51.9 173% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 223 166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 17GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 190 200 199 202 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 151 Write 1.7 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 191 20% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 6.1 32% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 224 164% 215 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 235GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 367 363 358 364 362 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 443 Mixed 440 SusWrite 362 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 53.6 175% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 214 161% 215 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 130%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 92GB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2626 Write 2,994 Mixed 2,896 637% 2,838 MB/s	4K Read 73.5 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 96.5 312% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,286 DQ Write 902 DQ Mixed 534 550% 907 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 14GB free Firmware: D785 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 75 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 64.2 Write 94.1 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 75.1 57% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 236% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 28GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 81 88 88 82 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 68.4 Write 92.2 Mixed 72 SusWrite 86.1 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.5 213% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 43GB free Firmware: D785 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 141 147 143 144 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 110 Write 119 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 142 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 273% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 90%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 76GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 161 163 177 158 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 122 Write 126 Mixed 95.9 SusWrite 163 175% 127 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 1 307% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 52GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 35 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 38.2 Write 38.7 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 36.7 49% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.7 222% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB 1,201 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 117GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 99 99 98 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 120 Write 125 Mixed 137 SusWrite 100 166% 121 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 1.4 329% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 103%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 26GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 84 89 89 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 82.4 Write 89.8 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 88.5 110% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 0.9 317% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 6.4 DQ Mixed 1 255% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 103%
WD easystore 264D 12TB 733 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 26GB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 36.6 Write 37 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 37.3 47% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 150% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 28GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 168 157 161 151 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 159 Write 169 Mixed 121 SusWrite 163 208% 153 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 1.1 366% 4.87 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 5.2 DQ Mixed 1.9 244% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 28GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 90 92 84 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 85.4 Write 89.4 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 87.3 115% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 1.2 332% 3.97 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 6 DQ Mixed 1.5 259% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 96%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 28GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 85 91 87 91 87 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 130 Write 133 Mixed 108 SusWrite 89.1 154% 115 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 1.1 345% 4.57 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 4.5 DQ Mixed 1.8 217% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x31.8GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 27.8 86% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 28.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 174%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	144	27"	1280 720	GSM5B7F 27GL850

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,926x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,528x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,292x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	763x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	594x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	500x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	378x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	367x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	427x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	267x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	229x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $921

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16