Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-P  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 277
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 910
86% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,377
85% 1,377 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Asus(1043 894B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 256
Parallax 198
133% 206 fps
MRender 316
Gravity 174
Splatting 130
160% 206 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 134%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Striker 960GB-$336
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 79 97 60 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 325
Write 67.9
Mixed 222
SusWrite 68.1
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 2.8
16% 5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 112%
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
893GB free
Firmware: 111150WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1983 1693 1639 1721 1661 1711 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 2,118
Mixed 1,801
SusWrite 1,735
424% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62
209% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 869
658% 886 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 285%
Great: 349%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
466GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 1201 1233 1193 1193 1158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,363
Write 1,254
Mixed 1,228
SusWrite 1,202
284% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 72.6
232% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 879
663% 890 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 240%
Great: 442%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
154GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 80 85 82 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 72.2
Write 69.4
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 83.1
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 197 187 199 194 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 200
Mixed 94.4
SusWrite 195
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.9
243% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 106%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 11 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24D1 ASUS VA24E
Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback