Notebook P65_67HSHP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook P65_67HSHP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_67HSHP
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '24 at 12:34
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 78 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 198 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 543 56% 451 Pts	64-Core 567 35% 567 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Lighting 96 Reflection 124 Parallax 95.6 78% 105 fps	MRender 90.2 Gravity 95.9 Splatting 103 80% 96.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 82%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 403 Write 434 Mixed 364 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 34.3 117% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 319 242% 325 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 98%
SSD 1TB 1TB 2,981 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 485GB free Firmware: FW210415 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 482 Write 383 Mixed 355 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 12.3 109% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 20 78% 172 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 209%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 576GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 118 Write 102 Mixed 60.1 69% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 170% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 2x16GB 927 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 24.3 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 23.4 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	63	49	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD046F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P65_67HSHP Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

System: Notebook P65_67HSHP

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	191x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	171x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	40x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	23x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $149Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	13x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x
Blue SATA M.2 250GBWD $89Bench 81%, 7,519 samples	8x

RAM
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	28x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	8x
CM4X8GF2400C16S4 2x8GBCorsairBench 72%, 789 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 153% - Outstanding

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16