MSI MS-16R8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Thin GF63 12UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R8  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 10 '24 at 15:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 246
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 480
53% 417 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13B6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 7.5
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 1
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison 512GB ESO512GHLCA1-21C-2MS 512GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 677 671 673 711 708 699 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 720
Mixed 731
SusWrite 690
199% 896 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 67.3
278% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 724
570% 801 MB/s
Poor: 171%
This bench: 222%
Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 33.6
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 23% 35 212 54 144 15.5" 1920 1080 CMN1521
Typical MS-16R8 Builds (Compare 1,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback