Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Thin GF63 12UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R8  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '24 at 11:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 65.3
1-Core 174
2-Core 345
100% 195 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 996
103% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13B6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver.
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 9.7
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 14.1
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison 512GB ESO512GHLCA1-21C-2MS 512GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,506
Write 715
Mixed 696
213% 972 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 65.8
249% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 775
593% 808 MB/s
Poor: 171% Great: 314%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 36.4
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical MS-16R8 Builds (Compare 1,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 19%
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 18%

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R8

The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback