Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 161 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 313 40% 304 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZEB-SD52 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: VE0R840J SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 230 229 231 229 227 MB/s Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.9% Good	Read 252 Write 230 Mixed 210 SusWrite 229 52% 230 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 32.1 113% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 169 123% 158 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PBT 1x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	25%	36	82	59	60	19.5"	1280 720	HPC1950 H20

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	33x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	10x

SSD
S6 256GBConsistentBench 66%, 182 samples	4x
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
ZEB-MN13 128GBBench 108%, 22 samples	3x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 54%, 260 samples	2x