Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707NV_FA707NV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive1.09% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707NV_FA707NV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA707NV
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 19:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 151
2-Core 282
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 804
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 981
61% 981 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 202D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.01.33
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 36.7
16% 27.2 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 21.1
17% 20.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.1 7.9 13 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.09% Terrible
Read 9.2
Write 278
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 10.8
18% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
0% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 36.3
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 24.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 103%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 214 56 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUODDA7 B173HAN04.9
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707NV_FA707NV Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707NV_FA707NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback