Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 15:09
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 147
2-Core 278
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,108
99% 839 Pts
64-Core 2,187
135% 2,187 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 206
Parallax 195
116% 181 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 153
Splatting 137
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 116%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30023 1TB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM005
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,084
Write 2,165
Mixed 748
300% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 67.3
262% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 799
597% 803 MB/s
Poor: 233% Great: 504%
Revuahn SATA 256GB
54GB free
Firmware: T060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 108 89 94 89 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 376
Write 270
Mixed 291
SusWrite 116
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 34.8
117% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 89.1
75% 108 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 94%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
54GB free
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 272 268 270 273 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 375
Write 276
Mixed 297
SusWrite 267
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 42.4
141% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 123
90% 116 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 131%
Generic S300 Hard drive 3TB
919GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 135 136 140 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 138
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 107%
Generic S300 Hard drive 3TB
919GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 73 76 86 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 144
Write 63.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 76.1
58% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 34.4
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 0R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 6% 18 213 58 144 27" 1280 720 DELA0D1 Dell S2716DG
History: Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B | Score 30: 0P 0R 7G 9B
Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,062
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback