Asus X99-M WS/SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS/SE  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 16:40
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 211
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 708
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3605) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 309 309 303 212 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 438
Mixed 432
SusWrite 275
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 48.7
149% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 348
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 88 93 288 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 446
Write 231
Mixed 364
SusWrite 156
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 40.9
136% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 333
250% 333 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 462%
Samsung 850 PRO 256G 187GB
44GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 213 220 219 134 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 453
Write 433
Mixed 362
SusWrite 187
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 40.1
138% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 343
260% 351 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF CP16G4DFRA32A.M8FF CP16G4DFRA32A.M8FF 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 35.2
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 21.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 34.1" 3440 1377 GSM76D8 34UM95
Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback