MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 278%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics246% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive378% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 1100 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '24 at 04:59
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 204
2-Core 407
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 805
8-Core 1402
133% 1,103 Pts
64-Core 1,934
120% 1,934 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
Nvidia(10DE 17AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 6006 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
246% Outstanding
Lighting 356
Reflection 359
Parallax 416
290% 377 fps
MRender 485
Gravity 316
Splatting 228
267% 343 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 246%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3633 2980 1962 1978 2059 2017 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 1,760
Write 4,010
Mixed 3,082
SusWrite 2,438
644% 2,822 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 89.5
289% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,737
DQ Write 1369
DQ Mixed 1,534
1,153% 1,547 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 378%
Great: 592%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 373 640 460 556 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
MSI M450 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2879 2927 882 157 131 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,586
Write 1,989
Mixed 1,442
SusWrite 1,189
350% 1,552 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 66.3
223% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,828
DQ Write 1,111
DQ Mixed 1,629
1,171% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 270%
Great: 347%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 469 474 449 459 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 460
Mixed 406
SusWrite 466
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 51.6
168% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
181% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 70.3
MC Mixed 67.6
187% 65.4 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 77.3
SC Mixed 59.1
178% 62.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 181%
Great: 297%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 24" 1280 720 SKG2402 H24T09P
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback