MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 283%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 297%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics247% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive400% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display5835 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '24 at 14:19
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 86.9
1-Core 212
2-Core 420
124% 239 Pts
4-Core 798
8-Core 1,447
135% 1,122 Pts
64-Core 1,968
122% 1,968 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
Nvidia(10DE 17AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
247% Outstanding
Lighting 361
Reflection 352
Parallax 414
294% 375 fps
MRender 491
Gravity 306
Splatting 220
264% 339 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 247%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3748 2304 1982 2065 2120 1875 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,280
Write 4183
Mixed 3,076
SusWrite 2,349
675% 2,972 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 95.7
308% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,784
DQ Write 1,360
DQ Mixed 1,581
1,180% 1,575 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 400%
Great: 592%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 416
Mixed 398
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 54
170% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
MSI M450 1TB
725GB free
Firmware: EJFM61.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,508
Write 2,822
Mixed 1,409
431% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 66.1
216% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,856
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1,658
1,184% 1,533 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 347%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 431
Mixed 418
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 50.8
168% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 00ee
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 7.7
9% 9.03 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
183% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 68.3
MC Mixed 69.3
188% 65.7 GB/s
SC Read 53
SC Write 80.4
SC Mixed 62.2
186% 65.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 183%
Great: 297%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 63.7" 1280 720 SKG2402 NV Surround
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback