PC NH5x_7xDCx_DDx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPC NH5x_7xDCx_DDx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO NH5x_7xDCx_DDx
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 16:37
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 202
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 612
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8520) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 76.2
67% 81.5 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 0.3
40% 56.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb PCS 2.5" SSD 512GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 240
Mixed 41.1
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 47.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
24% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 96%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
127GB free, PID a307
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.1
Write 37.7
Mixed 26.1
43% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
197% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO16GX4M1A2133C15 Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 3R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 27% 30 206 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical NH5x_7xDCx_DDx Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: PC NH5x_7xDCx_DDx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback