Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 190% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 217% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220225
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '24 at 07:30
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 78.7 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 1052 96% 806 Pts	64-Core 2,144 133% 2,144 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87AF) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.92 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	209% Outstanding	Lighting 309 Reflection 300 Parallax 322 252% 311 fps	MRender 350 Gravity 249 Splatting 188 206% 262 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Timetec MS31 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 611GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.F.8.P SusWrite @10s intervals: 2671 2209 3430 4013 1193 3236 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	358% Outstanding	Read 2,330 Write 3,576 Mixed 2,227 SusWrite 2792 619% 2,731 MB/s	4K Read 59.5 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 53 243% 90.8 MB/s	DQ Read 65.7 DQ Write 929 DQ Mixed 165 227% 387 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 358% Great: 358%
Intel SSDPEKKF512G8L 512GB 4,878 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 170GB free Firmware: L12P SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 524 529 541 550 561 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1,604 Write 827 Mixed 989 SusWrite 588 222% 1,002 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 69.7 224% 77.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,284 DQ Write 838 DQ Mixed 1,065 793% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 269%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 161GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 405 402 406 425 447 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 423 Mixed 364 SusWrite 414 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 85.4 4K Mixed 49.5 165% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 217 163% 218 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 307GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 156 159 160 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	76% Very good	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 158 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 10GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 21 39 26 26 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 255 Write 26.2 Mixed 42 SusWrite 26.5 80% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 83% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 48%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 32GB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 27GB free, PID 7722 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 3.7 4 1.3 3 6.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 57.4 Write 19.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.1 20% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 27% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 35.7 MC Mixed 38 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.5 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 35.9 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	120	42.5"	1280 720	GBT4300 AORUS FV43U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,059 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $105

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,683x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,319x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,448x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,261x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,089x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,476x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,850x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,110x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	776x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $120Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	650x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $938

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16