Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 15:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 265
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 959
88% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,485
92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 87C6) ≥ 4GB; Asus Tuf
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 171
Parallax 156
138% 165 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 135
Splatting 117
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,287
Write 2,121
Mixed 1,488
437% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 67.2
225% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 964
731% 989 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
109GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 138 140 142 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 136
Mixed 101
SusWrite 142
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 109%
Samsung STORY Station 1TB
555GB free, PID 5f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 59.5
Write 29
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 41.4
54% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 26.6
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 53.1
75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 217 58 60 40.1" 1920 1080 SAM0B60 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback