Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '24 at 13:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 629
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 34.4
20% 28.8 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 20
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 435 253 106 123 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 497
Write 438
Mixed 418
SusWrite 245
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 26.8
130% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 114
128% 212 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA400S37480G 240GB
131GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 129 110 47 112 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 505
Write 452
Mixed 419
SusWrite 151
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 29.3
127% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 1.1
81% 191 MB/s
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
887GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 109 107 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 77
SusWrite 109
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLLG42F-18---------- 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 21.5" 1920 1017 SAM0A1E S22C300
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback