Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '24 at 22:13
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	NIC-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 136 2-Core 269 89% 162 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 793 80% 651 Pts	64-Core 817 51% 817 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% EVGA(3842 3067) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 110 Parallax 126 101% 120 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 112 Splatting 103 104% 132 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 313GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 412 430 448 447 446 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 402 Write 336 Mixed 348 SusWrite 409 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 38.8 147% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 164 152% 230 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 102%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 148 153 150 147 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 150 Write 103 Mixed 100 SusWrite 147 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5701-049.A00G 2x16GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 24.1 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 20.2 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	18.9"	1280 720	HWP26A5 Compaq WF1907

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	397x
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	344x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	119x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	85x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	74x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	130x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	49x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	62x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16