Asus H110M-A/DP

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/DP (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1550 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '24 at 16:32
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 191 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 579 57% 466 Pts	64-Core 574 36% 574 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12044.3 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.5% Above average	Lighting 64.5 Reflection 60.9 Parallax 87.3 53% 70.9 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 45.7 46% 58.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 250GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN11628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 142 61 148 59 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 378 Write 142 Mixed 201 SusWrite 107 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 32.2 122% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 163 121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 110%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 126 126 125 127 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 173 Write 32.4 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 122 71% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.7% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.6 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 20.9 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 0P 0R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	47%	15	195	21	83	18.6"	1280 720	CHD0220 22P610FS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/DP Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/DP

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	82x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	73x
Core i5-6600KIntel $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	30x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	42x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	26x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	19x
P200 256GBPatriotBench 57%, 1,581 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	38x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GBCrucialBench 75%, 23 samples	18x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16