Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory40 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 326
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,124
105% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,530
95% 1,530 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2264 2342 2346 2271 2273 791 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2,282
Mixed 2,267
SusWrite 2048
509% 2,261 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 76.9
246% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 1,076
809% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 348%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$95
425GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 479 479 478 479 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 484
Mixed 455
SusWrite 478
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 56.1
182% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 123%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 479 479 479 479 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 485
Mixed 440
SusWrite 479
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 50.2
164% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
426GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 1425 1419 341 260 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,670
Write 1,139
Mixed 1,752
SusWrite 855
304% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 64.9
210% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 1,121
848% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 236%
Great: 365%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 243 241 240 238 335 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 753
Write 234
Mixed 470
SusWrite 274
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 63.1
207% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 293
302% 502 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 138%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 42.2
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 42.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 53
76% 53 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 0P 4R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 120 0" 2194 1234
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback