Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive350% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory40 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '24 at 22:34
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$292
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 327
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,113
104% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2254 2341 2287 2228 2200 1032 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 2,408
Mixed 2,284
SusWrite 2057
519% 2,305 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 76.8
244% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 1,071
807% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 350%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$96
425GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 479 479 481 478 477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 486
Mixed 453
SusWrite 479
109% 482 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 56.1
182% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 123%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 479 481 482 480 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 164
Mixed 173
SusWrite 480
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 34.4
119% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
275% 364 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
426GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1877 1845 345 327 174 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,668
Write 1,968
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 816
349% 1,550 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 65.2
210% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,119
847% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 234%
Great: 365%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 632 402 248 152 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 756
Write 668
Mixed 632
SusWrite 372
136% 607 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 62.2
205% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 295
314% 528 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 146%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 41.9
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 33.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 42
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 0P 5R 10G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 14% 44 200 50 120 0" 2194 1234
History: Score 22: 0P 4R 0G 2B | Score 47: 0P 5R 6G 4B | Score 46: 0P 5R 6G 3B | Score 59: 0P 5R 10G 4B
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback