Asrock Z77 Professional-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Professional-M  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 17:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 477
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 193
Parallax 119
99% 144 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 131
Splatting 111
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 425
Mixed 345
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 25.1
96% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 274
221% 307 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
173GB free
Firmware: AP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 82.1
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$31
259GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 84 86 84 81 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 98.7
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 81.3
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10FRK2/16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 45 240 31.5" 1280 720 MSI4DA6 MSI G32C4X
Typical Z77 Professional-M Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback