Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 04:54
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 59.2
2-Core 118
55% 87 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 290
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 189
Parallax 186
146% 185 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 186
Splatting 123
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S7780101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 532 719 732 734 735 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,222
Write 750
Mixed 886
SusWrite 664
197% 880 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 58.5
188% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 438
315% 408 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 166%
Great: 334%
Apacer AS350 512GB
291GB free
Firmware: U0511A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 299 392 403 404 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 418
Write 368
Mixed 367
SusWrite 324
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 25.5
108% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 47.1
73% 134 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 107%
Apacer AS350 256GB
173GB free
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 302 128 98 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 460
Write 284
Mixed 321
SusWrite 161
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 30
119% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 172
147% 214 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10FRK2/16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 14
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 50 7.2" 1920 1009 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback