CMS 7200-5704A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemCMS 7200-5704A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B460-PLUS
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 03:18
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 830
87% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,140
70% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 293
Reflection 260
Parallax 296
239% 283 fps
MRender 324
Gravity 239
Splatting 176
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1533 830 523 383 404 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,574
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,324
SusWrite 676
298% 1,329 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 78.3
276% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 1,005
756% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 235%
Great: 276%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
430GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1427 592 577 579 587 576 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2066
Write 2,309
Mixed 1,942
SusWrite 723
395% 1,760 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 82.2
290% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 1,095
820% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 266%
Great: 300%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
439GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 163 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 169
Mixed 107
SusWrite 162
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K4 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K4 32GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 26.7
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 17% 42 215 56 144 34" 1280 720 MSI3DA0 MSI MPG341CQR
History: Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B | Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B
Typical 7200-5704A Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: CMS 7200-5704A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback