Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2H-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-D2H-USB3  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 21:24
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 500
55% 433 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Asus(1043 05A5) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.3% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 171
Parallax 166
84% 147 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 117
Splatting 78.7
77% 95.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 224
Write 129
Mixed 180
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 15.9
73% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 19.4
25% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
112GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 55.9
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
8GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 43
Mixed 29.8
74% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.8
136% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
16GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.6
Write 103
Mixed 53.4
105% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
106% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical GA-H61M-D2H-USB3 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2H-USB3 - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback