HP 870-250no

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemHP 870-250no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 21:27
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 366
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.7% Excellent
Lighting 99.5
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
81% 104 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 97
Splatting 98.9
80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 448
Mixed 391
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 49.2
162% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 358
265% 351 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
420GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 176
Write 158
Mixed 98.9
107% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
60GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.9
Write 7.2
Mixed 12
19% 19 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
108% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 19% 26 210 58 60 23" 1280 720 ACR02EB G236HL
Typical 870-250no Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: HP 870-250no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback