Biostar A320MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 20:39
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 176
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 559
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
Biostar(1565 170B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 28.4
16% 21.4 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 14.1
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kzk-s100 240GB 240GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 212 60 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 493
Write 428
Mixed 416
SusWrite 153
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 30.6
146% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 48.8
99% 195 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
SWR256G-101IL 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 39 37 38 39 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 410
Write 443
Mixed 378
SusWrite 85.4
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 39.2
142% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 186
166% 247 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
464GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 106 108 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 106
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 60%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 113 116 112 115 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 28
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 3.6" 1280 720 TXD0000 HDMI
Typical A320MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback