Gigabyte GA-Z77P-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77P-D3  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121121
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 16:59
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 183
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 480
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 67.1
56% 69.4 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 67.4
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 64 63 62 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
44% Average
Read 347
Write 113
Mixed 150
SusWrite 62.6
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 21.7
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 33.4
32% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 44%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
279GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 84.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 77.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
369GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 78 77 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 49.6
Write 66.9
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 77.9
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HCT721010SLA360 1TB
240GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 64 63 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 48.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 63.7
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
354GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 116 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 63
SusWrite 116
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 165 27.2" 1920 1017 GSM5C03 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-Z77P-D3 Builds (Compare 769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77P-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback