Asus H110M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '24 at 09:51
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 197 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 389 52% 391 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 20.6 17% 19.8 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS500G3B0A-00AXR0 500GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 333GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP3105A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 344 220 19 158 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 462 Write 380 Mixed 239 SusWrite 162 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 81.6 4K Mixed 9.6 92% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 16 65% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 86%
MG04ACA400N 4TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2.5TB free Firmware: FJ8J SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 187 172 183 180 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 172 Mixed 92.4 SusWrite 177 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.9 245% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GB 7,364 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.8% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 8.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	40	11	60	21.5"	1920 1017	HWP322C HP P222va

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $86Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,128x
Core i5-6400Intel $72Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	645x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	557x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	847x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	475x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	369x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	315x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	166x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16