Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 451%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 545%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics404% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220330
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 22:23
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 210
2-Core 419
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 817
8-Core 1,634
144% 1,226 Pts
64-Core 2,901
180% 2,901 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
404% Outstanding
Lighting 650
Reflection 601
Parallax 744
530% 665 fps
MRender 553
Gravity 588
Splatting 316
380% 486 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 404%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 522 273 290 295 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 1784
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,909
SusWrite 489
363% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 69.1
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 104
365% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,939
DQ Write 1,572
DQ Mixed 1,653
1,265% 1,721 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 292%
Great: 365%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
306GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 482 260 249 249 249 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 479
Mixed 388
SusWrite 328
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 43.5
165% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 319
240% 322 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 98%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
511GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 200 199 200 200 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 212
Write 196
Mixed 158
SusWrite 200
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 1.4
82% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 7.1
DQ Mixed 1
2% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Pcie SSD 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,878
Write 2,294
Mixed 1683
437% 1,952 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 70
272% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 2,412
DQ Write 1,833
DQ Mixed 1,198
1,147% 1,814 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 284%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
37GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,566
Write 2,536
Mixed 2,406
559% 2,503 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 113
375% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 2,165
DQ Write 1,744
DQ Mixed 1,912
1,443% 1,940 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
269GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 97 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64% Good
Read 126
Write 134
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 95.6
69% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C38 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
162% Outstanding
MC Read 66
MC Write 62.8
MC Mixed 59.6
179% 62.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 29.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 149%
This bench: 162%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 100 34" 1280 720 VTK3401 GNV34DBE2
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,029
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback