Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 19:42
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 236
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 810
75% 624 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 123
Parallax 126
112% 129 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 109
Splatting 97.2
102% 129 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,141
Write 1367
Mixed 928
256% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 69.3
249% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 273
326% 563 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
18GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 426
Mixed 443
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 48.4
151% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 406
Mixed 362
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 50.3
161% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
7GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,112
Write 1,300
Mixed 1,568
368% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 59.1
228% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 854
640% 858 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
379GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.2
Write 106
Mixed 72.1
64% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
37GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.1
Write 82
Mixed 67.6
59% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
56GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.9
Write 38.5
Mixed 6
42% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
52% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2K3600C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27.8" 1280 720 GBT2701 AORUS AD27QD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,032
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback