MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics270% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory48.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 09:03
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$297
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 71.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 294
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 878
85% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,289
80% 1,289 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Nvidia(10DE 1794) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
270% Outstanding
Lighting 404
Reflection 386
Parallax 417
330% 402 fps
MRender 497
Gravity 335
Splatting 241
279% 358 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 270%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 4 68 3.5 15 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 385
Write 356
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 81.8
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 0.4
12% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.9
DQ Write 3.3
DQ Mixed 11.9
6% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 100%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
191GB free
Firmware: 614900WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,206
Write 3608
Mixed 2,745
713% 3,186 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 63.6
212% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,423
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1,264
948% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 1640 1626 1641 1633 1612 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,986
Write 1711
Mixed 1,714
SusWrite 1,592
394% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 62.6
200% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,144
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 961
736% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 285%
Great: 526%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
365GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 154 155 154 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 134
Write 150
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 154
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
164GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3GB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 59 59 57 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 72.4
Write 78.1
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 58.1
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C16-16GTZNC CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 F4-3600C16-16GTZNC CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 24.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 24.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 8 60 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3209 M32UC
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback